Strategic Management of the BMW

Plot: â€Å"Twelve Angry Men† is an intriguing and energizing jury-room showdown in which a "open and shut case" gets demanding as twelve outsiders fight for answers. The preliminary includes a nineteen-year-old kid, who is suspect of murdering his dad in a late-night fight with a phenomenal blade. His destiny currently lies in the hands of 12 legal hearers, each with his own assurance to explain the case and uncover reality. As the meeting follows through to its logical end, proof becomes investigated, tempers rise, and the jury room ejects in a yelling fight since one such legal hearer finds sensible questions in the two declarations that were esteemed believable enough to convict. In his battle for an absolution, the singled out member of the jury found that the tribute proof was inconsistent, however the auspicious style wherein both the man and the lady claimed to have seen and heard the respondent were by a wide margin deficient. Upon response to his vo te, the questionable members of the jury promptly started scrutinizing the man, not seeing how he might feel that way. All things considered, the resolute hearer held his ground and the votes were: 11 blameworthy, and 1 not liable, yet the choice must be consistent. Character: First there were those that couldn't think less about the result, at that point there was Davis, the relentless hearer who held a firm grasp onto the chance of sensible uncertainty for the situation. He showed his own quality of brain and took a stab at killing any individual biases for the best po...